Unsure which LED face mask is right for you? We compare the Shark CryoGlow and CurrentBody Skin Series 2 masks, analyzing their features, effectiveness, and value to help you make the best choice for your skincare needs. Discover which mask delivers the most radiant results!

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: A Detailed Comparison of LED Masks

Both the Shark CryoGlow and CurrentBody LED masks promise radiant skin through light therapy. However, there are key differences that can significantly impact your experience and results. Let’s break down the nuances of each mask.

Light Power and Wavelengths: More Than Just Numbers

Initially, the CurrentBody Skin mask might seem more potent due to its higher price tag. However, despite boasting 237 LED bulbs compared to the Shark CryoGlow’s 160, the CurrentBody mask lacks blue light, a crucial component for acne treatment. Its bulbs emit only red light (633nm) and near-infrared (NIR) light (830nm), with a few dedicated deep NIR bulbs (1,072nm) around the eyes.

The Shark CryoGlow, on the other hand, incorporates red (630nm), near-infrared (830nm), and blue light (415nm). Importantly, each bulb can emit all three wavelengths simultaneously, potentially delivering a more comprehensive treatment. This translates to 480 simultaneous light sources targeting your entire face. While the CurrentBody mask focuses heavily on red light therapy and near-infrared light, the Shark’s inclusion of blue light offers benefits for acne-prone skin, making it a versatile option.

In terms of irradiance, the Shark CryoGlow achieves a maximum of 128mW/cm², while the CurrentBody mask reaches 30mW/cm². This suggests a potentially more powerful light delivery from the Shark device.

Settings and Customization: Tailoring Your Light Therapy

One of the most significant differentiators lies in the settings and customization options. The CurrentBody mask offers a single, fixed red light and infrared setting. In contrast, the Shark CryoGlow features a remote with an LCD screen and a wheel for adjusting cooling pad temperature and selecting from three distinct modes:

Better Aging: Red and infrared light for fine lines and wrinkles.
Blemish Repair: A combination of red, infrared, and blue light for acne treatment.
Skin Sustain: All three wavelengths simultaneously for overall skin health.

This versatility makes the Shark CryoGlow ideal for individuals with multiple skincare concerns, allowing you to target specific issues like acne and aging with customized treatments. The CurrentBody’s lack of customization feels limiting, especially considering its price point.

Design and Comfort: Daily Wearability Matters

Both masks have adjustable straps, but the Shark’s sliding adjusters offer a more seamless and comfortable fit. The CurrentBody’s multiple velcro straps can be cumbersome and prone to getting caught in hair.

While both masks limit visibility, the CurrentBody’s intense light around the eyes can be blinding. The Shark CryoGlow, though bulky, allows for slightly more activity while wearing it. The interior materials also differ, with the Shark using a wipeable plastic and the CurrentBody featuring a silicone material that tends to attract dust and hair.

Real-World Results: Does the Proof Lie in the Skin?

In personal testing, the Shark CryoGlow demonstrated superior results, particularly in controlling acne. Switching to the CurrentBody mask resulted in a resurgence of breakouts, highlighting the importance of blue light for acne-prone skin. While the CurrentBody maintained a consistent glow and smooth texture, it didn’t significantly reduce fine lines or post-inflammatory erythema (red spots).

Portability and Travel: On-the-Go Skincare

The CurrentBody mask is undeniably more travel-friendly due to its flexible design. The Shark CryoGlow’s rigid structure makes it bulky and inconvenient to pack. The CurrentBody also boasts a longer battery life, requiring less frequent charging during travel.

The Verdict: Which LED Mask Wins?

While both masks offer potential benefits, the Shark CryoGlow emerges as the overall winner. Its versatility, powerful light output, customizable settings, and effectiveness in treating acne make it a superior choice for most users. Although the CurrentBody mask is more travel-friendly, the Shark’s comprehensive features and proven results outweigh this advantage. Ultimately, the best mask for you depends on your specific skincare needs and priorities. If acne is a primary concern, the Shark CryoGlow’s blue light is a game-changer.